Business law – group assignment

yes and we need other day by the inspector for me [Music] I talk about the food instead there there must be at least several people what shakes it’s part of the fight Samuel even once [Music] I you if you don’t mind we would like to hire business we sell my business shoe to you but if you agree to buy it for $39 yeah II agree that price us you 10,000 in cash 20 Cheryl varnish and aventures for the remaining 9,000 or by the company we already discussed and agreed upon you as a director thank you I hope I can handle this company with full responsibility another I manipulated it was appointed by the unsecured creditors you know nice to review I am sorry to hurt that you are unable to send your company and it with into liquidation it’s okay thank you for your concern I come here is to realize the company and settle the depths or to the creditors oh I see you can do a job as my secretary if you need I’ve realized all the assets of the company however the total amount just around six thousand ended the asset were enough to pay off secured creditor including Solomon who was a debenture holder and secured creditor like new has recovered nothing from the liquidation liquidation proceed seriously is just that much is it possible to a big company like Solomon have just just have six thousand ringgit amount of asset yeah that what I have realized the director has used the money to pay off the debenture as the creditor holding was considered a secured creditor I can accept this I do so Solomon to avoid you from getting I will try to take this case to the court and allege that the company was a fraud the reason why I upon you to this case because I just watch Solomon to have the responsibility to the company death if you want like that I will overlook this case [Applause] the creditors could not recover data as the contract were in the company and not with the salami I hope that since salaamed was the major addition of the 20001 chest as copper dimension of the remaining fixtures and he was also a director of the company therefore the company belongs to Sullivan and that he could be liable to settle all their own into the editors of the company as cinnamon and coal is a company and therefore has separate legal personality it could not be said it Salameh on the company the company is Salam and are two legal percent in law it is a company which has the power to enter into contract I’m sorry miss I couldn’t help you anymore because all the decision I’ve already signed whatever it is I will sue so he’s the only one responsible for these things no means you can debts of the company and the responsibility of the company and not salam on it is the company which entered into contracts with you and you only can sue the company and not its shareholders salam on ability as a shareholders is limited this is not fair he’s the one granted the business and the company is belong to him the company can employ people to run the business and Solomon was entitled to be considered an employee of the company in his capacity as the director of the company it is same like company must sue in his name for anyone commits against it if any wrong has been committed against the company it is the company who can sue to recover its losses oh I see then the shoe business belong to the company and not to Solomon once the contracts were entered into between the company and the Solomon this means it should be like that

Related posts

  • Business law assignment

    so we are a good number 27 it’s reach our decorously number k ac3 139 and other group member from my group is him in the South Cota and at e3 GG edit we…

  • Case study- group assignment of business law group s4-20

    okay [Applause] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] it seems you’re in a brew I can see three things in this first you made a contract and there should be…

  • Business law assignment

    in the isolated villages of Tanzania rivers are a source of life they are also a source of disease this man is a corn farmer and father of five but for…

Business law assignment

so we are a good number 27 it’s reach our decorously number k ac3 139 and other group member from my group is him in the South Cota and at e3 GG edit we are doing test number 20 it’s Australian tours versus chillers now the fat is involved in these situations are they safe or supermarkets that is a different lid and the other is zelos naho clips in the wig flow in the bed Manning and see in being a plaintiff similarly in this case we can found some issues issues that happened in the case and issues that we can discuss is that the defendant where the plaintiff a duty of care a duty of fear is the most important part in this care and over the defendant in the breach of the duty of care because of the plaintiff was injured in the wet floor due to lack of the warning sign or due to the failure to obey this service to the plaintiff from the supermarket and other issues may arise as the way the plaintiff’s injuries a consequences of the defendants failure to obey the tube clear similarly we have some facts that can be reveal in this case and me being as a plaintiff claim against the defendant separate stairs because while entering the Safeway stores as a supper I slipped on a break floor and wait learning and I am being injured there was no annulus warning time so we can seek further further advice for the advice for this Crillon store supermarket as if the risk warning sign is the same – did the plaintiff safety if the spume surface storage levers for the compensation for the injured that is me myself and what is the response of the stepped occupier towards its visitors there gsst adopted in the supermarket regarding the visitor safety so that they can wander within red flow and others like advice could be as if the injuries caused by the occupiers negligence of course it seems to be like if they have put the warning signs and that we determine myself couldn’t have been slept in a red floor I might get concerned about the with closed sign further we can have some like lose some readers rules and laws that can be discussed in this case so we can have a like Xcode allows we can address the legal concerns ready relieve any laws that for the acquires liability and it is very important to be to mind whether the visitor was a trespasser that is a person who enters with all the occupiers invitations and a licensee a person permitted or in invited to adhere so we have got so much issues with in this case so we can like summarize the rules and regulations it’s like that the law of the occupiers liability is concerned with the duty of care UTS clear obeid occupiers so we have got some of the legal rules as a duty of care the breach of Duty oh dear and we can apply the rules and in this case like in reference to the in reference to details will EJ in endemic versus Thames in 1856 ll1 CP 274 at P Tony 8/8 it was the occupied obligations to prevent damage onions and ended up weeks picking you that was exactly I was about to go that if occupiers make it ends so that they could have get a warning sign and meaning as a plaintiff I could get one from being harmed so we could seek a further you know for the service that lack need the occupiers then to have future damage thank you [Music]

Related posts